Question. Why is that the movies that you can most assuredly live the rest of your life without ever watching, have sequels??
Makes me wonder. How bad does a movie have to be before people realize it sucks??
What is that about?
Do they have to go like: “Eh! Just checking to see if it could have gotten worse! Yep! It was awful the first time. It's horrible now!!”
Can I name a few movies like this? How about one??
That so-called action movie with Sly Stallone and as many other old farts as can be gathered on one set!! Arnie Schwarznegger, Harrison Ford, and a host of others trying to recapture that magic back when they were in their heydey!
There's a 2 and a 3 for this movie? Are you kidding me??
The baileypop blog summed up these movies in one of their posts:
My excuse for watching is totally legit. Two words. Chuck Norris. He's my hero!
Wouldn't matter if he were 105 years old. If I get taken as a hostage. Send Chuck! If he's busy, I'll wait.
Can you name a few films you would put on the same list with "The Expendables"? :)
Republished content. First presented at Persona Paper, August 2015.
Image credit and Additional Info:
* * BLOG PAGES * *
- HOME Page
- Food Ways for Foodies
- Grocery & Gourmet
- Health Insurance
- Feng Shui Gifts
- My Shopping Channel
- Daily Two Cents
- Cmoneyspinner on Pinterest
- Cmoneyspinner Around the Web
- Home Business Works
- Earn Income on BlogJob
- BUY Art Posters & Prints
- Get Paid to Test Apps
- Hiring for Social Media Jobs
- Freelance Work
- Biz Info and Tips on G+
- We Buy Private Loans
- The Bing Bing
- * * BLOG SPONSORS * *